Below is a partial snippet of a past conversation I
had with M. Heleus on the topic ;
M. Heleus ; “..good questions--evidently some entities can be interrogated, but
have a robotic quality similar to autism since they don't apparently either
have, or are connected to, their higher parts as most people in the ordinary
range are by the higher harmonics in their voices, as Tomatis' work tends to
show, and as amplified also by Manfred Clynes' work re essentic signatures and
their sonification. So normally we are hearing the mental circuits still
reverberating in the plenum, phantom-leaf style, left by the deceased as an
organized sensitivity plenum impression, pulsing phase locked feedback and
forward loops of trapped BEC potentials modulated only 3 or even less levels
deep. When questioned, these can only produce pre-canned answers devoid of any
real originality or objectivity at an autistic or even animal level. (4
mod-levels or more probably would sound like originality.) You might write
XXXXXX re his recent EVP experiences at XXXXX@windstream.net. As for Oates,
work, yes he's onto something of magnitude, when the technique is well handled.
It turns on the understanding of time proceeding forwards and backwards
simultaneously, a situation our brain decussation seems designed to help
integrate.--M
Donald Adams ( Me) ; > hmmm
>
> thats interesting... I never knew what to think of his work, I reviewed it
quickly some time >ago and moved on... not that I dismiss EVP phenomena
right out of hand, just couldnt >figure out how to get anything practically
useful out of it. This is weirdly reminiscent to >the aussie who was
marketing'ReverseSpeech'... wonder if he's still doing that.
>
> So, whats your take on all this, you think this phenomena is real
then? If it is, what do >you think it may be... and what sort of
utility may be extracted from it?
>
> I thought that most of his stuff resulted in nonsensible colloquialisms or
the kinds of >phrases you'd expect if you were having a conversation with
someone who had severe >autism or something.... even if its relatively clear
enough to make out word wise... is it >nonsense or actually meaningful
information?
>
> --- On Fri, 7/10/09, Michael Heleus <mheleus1@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
> From: Michael Heleus <mheleus1@cox.net>
> Subject: Re: BINGO - Got it!
> To: "Doc Stars"
<doc_starz@yahoo.com>
> Received: Friday, July 10, 2009, 8:58 PM
>
> Sure, Raudive's s/n ratio was poor, and just
speeding or slowing the playback and simple filters were about all the tech he
had to help--now, anyone with compression/pattern recognition software coming
with a mac o/s can crank up mic sensitivity to get very distinct high n/s ratio
voices. A friend, xxx xxxxx, recently was videotaping a wrestling match, and
when they were out of the room, and only his two colleagues present, he had to
up the gain on his mic, noticed a sound like running water beyond the silence
levels, and further gain with pattern recognition filtering gave very
intelligible voices--one was saying, evidently in reference to his colleagues
by the mic 'who are these people?'
>
>
>> Im not so sure I would have connected these
two so easily, the filter constant and Raudives work... didnt Raudiv find
mostly gibberish?
>>
>> --- On Fri, 7/10/09, Michael Heleus
<mheleus1@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Michael Heleus
<mheleus1@cox.net>
>> Subject: Re: BINGO -
Got it!
>> To: "Doc
Stars" <doc_starz@yahoo.com>
>> Received: Friday, July
10, 2009, 11:46 AM
>>
>> Yes, I meant
Konstantin Raudive--sorry about that
>> misspelling w/o the
final e--M
>>
>> The train of
correlations grabs the attention,
>> but so does the fact
that the source number is
>> dependent on a set of
image distortion
>> parameters--quarter
wavelength does sound a bit
>> cubic, and s/n ratio =
10 does string you on a
>> bit, but can we then
bite on the whole bit?
>> better not--bitter
disappointment, since once
>> again the conventional
agreement word/number
>> world doesn't align
with the deeper abstract
>> reality, in this case
involving the phase
>> conjugation of the 30
birds fn. It might be
>> possible thus to get
higher entity transmission
>> using the .9+
compression system for signal
>>
>> recognition in a
Raudiv effect context, given the
>> original arbitrary
constraints stand up. M
>>
>>
>> >Old story... you
want something done, roll up
>> >your sleeves and
do it yourself instead of
>> >asking crusty old
atmospheric academics...
>> >
>> >Ok, so here it is
- wanted to share since you
>> >run stuff past me
all the time...
>> >
>> >So ; 1.090537599
>> >
>> >Is an inverse
noise filter
>> >
>> >1 / 1.090537599 =
0.916978929
>> >
>> >Check it ;
>> >
>>
>http://spie.org/x648.html?product_id=364126
>> >
>> >But the REALLY
interesting part is this ;
>> >
>> >0.916978929 /
0.0340793
>> >
>> >Equals, guess
what?
>> >
>> >26.90721139
>> >
>> >or... 3^3
>> >
>> >A what? A
cube!
>> >
>> >Recall our
previous convos on universe being nested teseracts et al?
>> >
----- Forwarded
Message -----
From: Doc Stars <doc_starz@yahoo.com>
To: "sound_of_stars@yahoogroups.com"
<sound_of_stars@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: "soundofstars@groups.facebook.com" <soundofstars@groups.facebook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 6:46:44 PM
Subject: Re: Alien Voices - EVP - ITC - Instrumental Transcommunication
Alien Voices - EVP -
ITC - Instrumental Transcommunication
Instrumental Transcommunication
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKXcl1aWtf8
(Preview)
5. THE LANGUAGE OF THE VOICES AND HOW
THEY SPEAK
Although we are far from grasping the full complexities of the phenomenon as
yet, the so-called "voices from beyond", are easily distinguishable
from terrestial human voices. They speak in an unmistakable rhythm and usually
employ several languages in a single sentence; the sentence construction obeys
rules that differ radically from those of ordinary speech and, although the
voices seem to speak in the same way as we do, the anatomy of their
"speech-apparatus" must be different from our own.
Apart from their paranormal characteristics, the voices that manifest on tape
show great similarities to those produced by ordinary human speech organs. It
is possible that they may use already existing human voice material. They are
softer, (those in Class B or C generally only a whisper) but they do seem to be
produced through some kind of speech-apparatus.
I will summarise briefly the characteristics I have mentioned in this section:
http://soundofstars.org/disclosurepart1.htm
From: Doc Stars
<doc_starz@yahoo.com>
Subject: Alien Voices - EVP - ITC - Instrumental Transcommunication
To: "sound_of_stars@yahoogroups.com"
<sound_of_stars@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: "soundofstars@groups.facebook.com"
<soundofstars@groups.facebook.com>
Received: Thursday, January 5, 2012, 12:48 PM
Alien Face on Off TV
http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/TV_Alien.html
on 23 Dec 89 a lady named Renee photographed her daughter on a
hobbyhorse next to a 19-inch TV. She saw nothing unusual; but,
when
she got the picture back there was a full-screen head of an alien
on the TV.
The TV was not on. This appears to be a case of instrumented
transcommunication
(ITC), a phenomenon studied by several groups in various countries
and written about recently in The Quarterly Review of the Institute
of Noetic Sciences [5]. This is alien technology. Both images look
like they could be the same alien species. The lighting on each
picture emphasizes a circular area on the side of the head above
the area where we have ears. Perhaps this circular area is an organ
associated with the direct projection of thought. It makes me
wonder. These images seem to be influencing our thoughts. I wonder
it they could be a part of a joint human-alien program to do so.
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/51230/KGB_Abduction_Files_1_9/
http://www.nationalufocenter.com/artman/publish/article_26.php
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtogfPqkh1M
http://www.worlditc.org/h_08_schreiber_0.htm
http://heyfreqs.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/
( CLICK THIS LINK )
